 |
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS, SEVERITY OF DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMATOLOGY AND SICKNESS
ABSENCE RATE IN THE HUNGARIAN POPULATION
SOCIECONOMIC FACTORS, DEPRESSION AND ABSENCE RATE Institute of
Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Budapest,
Hungary From Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University of
Medicine, Budapest, Hungary (Prof. Kopp, Mr. Szedmák), Hungarian Association
of Mutual Benefit Funds, Budapest (Dr. Skrabski)
Psychosom.Res.39,8,1o19-1o29,1995. in: Published MARIA S. KOPP, MD, PhD,
Med. Habil., ÁRPÁD SKRABSKI, PhD, SÁNDOR SZEDMÁK Reprint requests to Prof.
Dr. Maria S. Kopp, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, H-1o89 Budapest,
Nagyvárad t.4, Hungary This study was supported by the OTKA 1129/91 and
OTKA 2502/93 research grants of the National Research Fund
Abstract
On the basis of a study of 15.700 persons representative of the active
(working and studying) Hungarian population over the age of 16 by age, sex,
place of residence and occupation, an analysis was made on the relationships
between socioeconomic factors, severity of depressive symptomatology, and
sickness absence rate. Sickness absence rate was regarded as a measure of
general morbidity rate. Measured by the Shortened Beck Depression Inventory,
the severity of depression was found to be very closely connected to working
absenteeism. Hierarchical log linear analysis was performed to investigate the
interactive effects of socioeconomic factors, severity of depressive
symptomatology on absent rate. The material socioeconomic factors such as
housing situation, accessibility to a car, own properties have had no direct
impact on general morbidity, only mediated by the effect of depression in the
more disadvantageous groups of population. All of the measured socioeconomic
factors with the exception of place of residence were in close direct
connection with depressive symptomatology and according to the hierarchical
log linear analysis depression mediates between socioeconomic factors and
higher morbidity rate reflected in higher working absent rate in more
disadvantageous groups. The persisting socioeconomic differences in health
status of the population might be mediated by chronic hopelessness, manifested
first of all in depressive symptoms.
Keywords: socioeconomic factors, depressive symptomatology, sickness absence rate, national
representative study
Introduction An unresolved paradox of the
public health studies today is, that in spite of the substantial improvement
in the health status of the population, there is a considerable health
inequality between the social strata. The socioeconomic situation seems to be
the most important risk factor, more important than the traditional factors
(1,2). A highly significant inverse association can be found between
socioeconomic situation and morbidity and mortality rate in the western
countries. This inverse relationship persists even when controlled for health
practises such as smoking, obesity and lack of exercise (3-5). The
well-developed societies grant adequate food, housing and medical care.
Explanations other than material deprivation must be sought to understand the
persisting socioeconomic differences in health status of the
population. These considerations are particularly important in Hungary
today, because in Hungary the life expectancy became the lowest and the
mortality rate figures the highest among the European countries (6). Since the
sixties there was a considerable worsening tendency in the mortality and
morbidity statistics in Hungary. While in 1970 the mortality rate of Austria
or Great Britain was higher than in Hungary, until the nineties Hungary has
reached the worst situation, with 14,0 mortality per 1000 persons (6). On
the other hand among 1960 and 1988 there was a constant increase in the gross
domestic product in Hungary (with a 208% increase compared to the 1960 level)
and Hungary was among the best economically situated compared to the
neighbouring countries (6), thus the worsening health status of the Hungarian
population cannot be explained by worsening material situation. The
question arises which are the possible important background factors of the
catastrophic mortality and morbidity rates in the eighties in Hungary? With
the aid of two national representative studies conducted in 1983 and in 1988
we analysed the complex relationships between the health status of the
population and the psychological and sociological background factors
(7-11). Our initial hypothesis was that in modern societies the temporary
or lasting failure to cope with the changing psychological, social, and
economic situation and the consequent emotional disturbances are more
important background factors of working disability than the physical handicaps
and causes. According to Murphy et al (12), depression carried a substantial
risk for poor health status of the population as a result of longitudinal
research in Stirling County, Atlantic Canada. We found from the results of
our pilot survey in 1983, that the population is not homogeneous as regards
neurosis and chronic disorders. This survey showed considerable differences
between social strata, with the highest rate of both neurotics at risk and
chronic disorders among unskilled workers (7). The purpose of the survey
conducted in 1988 was to study the interactions of the psychological, social
and economic factors in connection with the health status and the reduced
capacity for work in the Hungarian population.
Subjects and methods
Sampling method and the organisation of the national representative
survey The investigation is based on an analysis of the national
representative study of the Hungarian population over the age of 16 according
to sex, age and place of residence. The survey was conducted in the form of
home interviews in 1988. We interviewed a total of 20,902 persons, among them
15,700 were active workers or students. In the present study we evaluated only
the data of the active population. Combined selection method was used to
form the sample. We used a selection method combining stratified sampling with
multi-step sampling. The strata-forming criteria were:
- distribution of the population by sex
- distribution of the population by age
- distribution of the population by region (counties)
- distribution by settlement size (town-village ratio)
- distribution of the active population by occupation.
On the basis of the determination of
stratification, we selected the sample items in a number of steps. In the
first step we selected the settlements to be observed from the official
register of settlements of Hungary, in such a way that all settlement with a
population over 5000 were included in the sample and the method of random
selection was used among those with a population of less than 5000. In the
second step we selected, in order, the district, street and house of the place
of residence within the settlements included in the sample. The interviewer
recorded the data of one person in every second household within the
residential area indicated. Since the investigation concerned not the
household, but an individual within the household, a further sampling was
carried out according to sex, age and occupation, on the basis of criteria
given in advance. The refusal rate was 12% for the full sample, although
there were significant differences depending on the settlements. In big cities
the refusal rate was much higher than in villages. In the case of refusal the
interviewers selected an other person with similar sampling characteristics in
the given area.
The questionnaires
In the interviews, the
following groups of questions were asked:
- demographic characteristics (sex, age)
- socioeconomic characteristics :
-father's employment (manager to unskilled worker),
-level of education (university degree to less than eight year of primary school),
-employment status (manager to unskilled worker),
-personal income(in Forint),
-place of residence(town to farm),
-housing situation(without comfort to luxury),
-access to a car,
- own property- summer residence
- Shortened Beck Depression Inventory (13,14,8)
- sickness absence rate in the past year (number of days on sick leave) by disease groups. The sickness absent rate was regarded as a general measure of the morbidity rate of the active population.
The group of questions concerning the socio-economic situation contained 107
questions, the group concerning the functional emotional disturbances, that is
depression, neurosis, health status, social maladjustment and background
factors contained 209 questions.
Shortened version of the Beck
Depression
Inventory (BDI)
We analysed all the variables of
the BDI (13) by stepwise regression analysis, with the aid of the data of our
earlier surveys (8,15). The nine variables showing the closest correlation
with the overall depression score were included in the shortened version. The
questions of the shortened questionnaire are related to the following
characteristics of depression: social withdrawal, inability to make decisions,
sleep disorder, fatigability, exaggerated anxiety over somatic complaints,
inability to work, pessimism, lack of satisfaction, and the inability to feel
pleasure, and self-blame. Our shortened BDI is a modified version of the
original shortened BDI (14). The Beck Depression Inventory and its shortened
versions are reliable methods of measuring the seriousness of the depressive
syndrome (16). It correlates very well with estimates of the seriousness of
depression made by psychiatrists. On the basis of comparison of BDI and
the shortened version we could transform relaibly the sum of the shortened
questionnaire into the original score (8). The risk of seriousness of
depressive syndrome can be evaluated according to Eaves and Rush (17) as
follows:
0-9 points |
normal |
10-18 points |
mild depressives |
19-25 points |
moderately severe depressives |
26 points or higher |
severe depressive symptoms |
Questionnaire on health status and sickness absence level In
elaborating the questionnaire the disease groups of the Yearbook of the
Ministry for Health and Welfare were applied. The subjects answered two
questions for 26 disease groups on whether they had suffered the given illness
at some time in their life, and how many days they had spent on sick leave due
to the given illness in the past year. Adding up the sick leave for the
different disease groups, we calculated the total number of days on sick leave
(sickness absence rate) for the whole past year for each subject. This item
figures in the multivariate analyses as a general parameter of the mortality
rate among the active population.
Statistical methods
The SPSS
statistical program system was used for data analysis. Hierarchical log linear
analysis (18) was performed to investigate the interactive effect of social
factors, depression, neurosis on working absenteeism. The parameters of the
analysis are L= Likelihood ratio, df = degree of freedom, p =
probability.
RESULTS
The distribution of depressive symptoms
in the Hungarian population Table 1. shows the prevalence of depressive
symptoms in the Hungarian population in 1988. Figure 1. shows the
distribution of depressive symptoms by age and sex. 24.3 % of the
population over 16 complains of symptoms of depression, that is, one quarter
of adults and adolescents. 7.5 % of those questioned suffer from moderately
severe or severe depressive symptoms, 6.8 % of men and 8.1 % of
women. According to social strata, symptoms of depression were least
characteristic of managers (3.8 % suffer serious or moderately serious
depression);among white collar workers not in manager position it was 5.5%,
the corresponding proportion was 5.8 % for skilled workers and 10.2 % for
unskilled labourers. Among the Beck Depression Inventory items the future was
seen as hopeless by 6.4 % of managers, 8.6 % of skilled workers, 14.3 % of
unskilled workers.(Table 2)
Sick leave - working absenteeism
The
statistical publications do not give the number of sick persons, but the
incidence of diseases, that is, the number of cases. In our data survey we
asked each subject about sick leave by groups of diseases. The proportion
of occurrence of sick leave (working absenteeism) in the last year was 42.9 %
for the active population. The sum of the percentages given in the table is
higher than that, 73.6%, since individuals were on sick pay due to several
different diseases. The figures of Table 3, based on the 1988 survey, show
the percentages of the absent rates because of the different causes in the
past year, by disease groups. The occurrence of sickness absenteeism in the
last year was most frequent among unskilled workers (48%). It was 45% among
the skilled workers, 43% among the non-manager white collar workers and 42%
among managers. Exceptions are metabolic diseases other than hepatic diseases,
diseases of the blood and blood forming organs, asthma bronchiale and diseases
related to pregnancy which occurred most frequently among non-graduate white
collar workers, and gastrointestinal diseases, chronic skin diseases and
accidents that are most frequent among the skilled workers. There was no
difference between the occurrence of absenteeism between the male and female
workers (43% and 42% correspondingly).
Relationships between
socioeconomic characteristics, depression and absent rate. Because of
the considerable sex differences in depression we analysed the relationships
separately for men and women.
Characteristics of men
Figure
2. shows the relationships between socioeconomic characteristics, severity
of depression and sickness absent rate for men by hierarchical log linear
analysis in the cases where there was no direct relationship between the
socioeconomic factors and morbidity, only mediated by depression. There was a
very close direct relationship between depression and sickness absenteeism
(L= 149.6, df= 49, p<0.000). According to Figure 2. neither housing
condition (a) (convenience of flat), (b) place of residence, (c)
accessibility to a car, nor own property (d) showed direct association
with working absenteeism.
On the other hand, there was a very significant
direct relationship between the housing condition and depression (L=234.5,
df=28, p<0.0000), accessibility to a car and depression (L= 259.6, df=
21, p<0.0000) and own property (summer residence) and depression (L=
41.1, df= 21, p<0.005). The place of residence showed no connection with
either depression or sickness absent rate among men.
Figure 3. shows
those socioeconomic characteristics among men that were in direct connection
with working absent rate, but in each case depression mediated more
effectively between the given factors and the working absent rate than these
direct connections. The relationship between the given socioeconomic factor
and depression was in each case significantly more close, than the direct
association between the given socioeconomic factor and the working
absenteeism. These socioeconomic factors are:
personal income and absent rate |
(L=89.2, df=49, p<0.0004) |
personal income and depression |
(L= 192.2, df= 49, p<0.0000) |
Employment status and absent rate |
(L= 59.6, df=21, p<0.0000) |
employment status and depression |
(L= 114.9, df= 21, p<0.0000) |
father's employment and absent rate |
(L= 64.9, df= 21, p<0.0000) |
father's employment and depression |
(L= 76.3, df= 21, p<0.0000) |
level of education and absent rate |
(L= 147.8, df= 49, p<0.00000) |
level of education and depression |
(L= 202.5, df=49, p<0.0000) |
Characteristics of women Among women the picture was less
clear. The connection between depression and absent rate was also very close
among women (L= 179.2, df= 49, p<0.00000). In the case of the overall
socioeconomic characteristics of the family, depression mediates between these
factors and the absent rate among women too. Figure 4. There was no
direct connection between the housing conditions, accessibility to a car and
absent rate, but a highly significant connection can be seen between the
housing conditions and depression (L= 216.1, df= 28, p<0.0000), and the
accessibility to a car and depression (L= 178.4, df=21,
p<0.0000). It was a significant direct connection between own
property (summer residence) and absent rate (L= 37.7, df= 21, p<0.01) but
the effect mediated by depression was more significant: summer residence
and depression ( L= 43.5, df= 21, p<0.002) (Figure 5) In the
cases of the father's employment and the level of education there was a
significant direct connection with absent rate, but including depression into
the analysis, its effect overweighed the direct effects of these socioeconomic
factors:
father's employment and absent rate |
(L= 42.8, df= 21, p<0.003) |
father's employment and depression |
(L=116.6, df= 21, p<0.0000) |
level of education and absent rate |
(L=110.2, df= 49, p<0.0000) |
level of education and depression |
(L= 338.8, df=49, p<0.0000) |
Employment status and absent rate |
(L= 50.7, df= 21, p<0.0000) |
In the case of women on the contrary to men, the place of residence was
significantly connected with absent rate. Including depression into this
analysis too, its effect proved to be also important. Place of residence and
absent rate (L= 49.6, df= 28, p<0.007) place of residence and
depression (L= 52,6, df= 28, p<0.003).
On the other hand, in the group of
women in the cases of personal income and the employment status, there were
more close direct connections with absent rate than mediated by depression.
(Figure 6.)
Personal income and absent rate |
(L= 106.4, df=49, p<0.000) |
Personal income and depression |
(L= 93.1, df= 49, p<0.0001) |
Employment status and absent rate |
(L= 50.7, df= 21, p<0.0000) |
Discussion
In the last years depression or vital exhaustion
has been found to be risk indicators for coronary heart disease (19-22).
Learned helplessness or hopelessness, which can be regarded the best model of
depression result in decreased immunological activity that influences the
tumour growth (23) and an inverse relationship can be seen between severity of
depression and susceptibility to different kinds of infections (24)
Self-destructive behaviours such as suicidal behaviour, alcohol abuse, smoking
are in very close association with depression (7). Hippius (25) stated, that
the considerable proportion of the population suffers from depressive symptoms
and complaints that cannot be sufficiently included into the present
diagnostic categories. The severity of depressive symptomatology can be
regarded as an important measure of mental state of the population. According
to our study about one fourth of the active population can be regarded as at
risk of mild or more severe depressive smptomatology and 7.5 % as suffering
from moderately severe to severe depressive symptomatology. According to
our national representative study in the active population of Hungary a very
close positive correlation was found between working absent rate and severity
of depressive symptomatology both among men and women. The absent rate can be
regarded as the direct measure of general morbidity of the different origin.
It is especially true for men, because the lasting working absenteeism has
serious financial consequences. In 1988, the year of our study, there was no
unemployment in Hungary, this fact underlines the significance of the absence
rate among men. In spite of the fact that most of the women had had a working
place in 1988, in the family economy the salary of the women was in many cases
of minor importance. The salaries of the women in the similar situations were
much lower than the corresponding salaries of the men. Therefore for a woman
the working absenteeism could be an intermediate possibility to arrange family
problems, not speaking of the child care, which is also part of the absent
rate in the case of women. Because of these considerations, the working absent
rate of men can be regarded as a direct measure of morbidity rate among men,
and only with precautions among women. Therefore the interrelationships of
socioeconomic factors, depression and general morbidity rate (working
absenteeism) among men have special importance. The severity of depressive
symptomatology has had a direct negative connection with social class as
measured by working activity. These results are in good agreement with the
literature (1,3,26). The item analysis of depressive symptomatology has
special significance, showing higher level of hopelessness in the lower social
strata that can be an important background factor of higher susceptibility of
illnesses. All of the measured socioeconomic factors with the exception of
place of residence were in close direct connection with higher depressive
symptomatology and according to the hierarchical log linear analysis
depression mediates between socioeconomic factors and higher morbidity rate
reflected in higher working absent rate in more disadvantageous groups. The
material socioeconomic characteristics first of all accessibility to car,
housing conditions, and own property were not at all connected directly to
morbidity, that is absent rate, only mediated by higher depression
symptomatology in persons with no car, living in houses without comfort and
having no own summer residence. This connection might be two sided. It might
be, that persons with lasting mood disorders are both more susceptible to
different kinds of disorders, and parallely they are less able to improve
their social conditions. An other explanation might be that relatively
deprived persons living among undesirable social conditions (such as without
car, without comfort) might suffer from constant relative deprivation
(12,26,27), might sense helplessness and constant loss of control over their
own situation which in long run might result in depressive symptoms. They
might regard the future as hopeless - as we found according to the item
analysis, they might blame themselves for their low achievements. Further
socioeconomic situations were partly in direct connection with morbidity but
in each case the mediating effect of depression overweighed this direct
effect. The father's employment and the level of education have special
importance, because especially the first one cannot have two-sided
explanations. The father's employment shows very significant connection with
depression, that is the family origin determines a considerable part of the
later risk for depression and thus higher morbidity rate. In the case of
education it is possible to hypothesise that persons with depressive
personality have a lower chance for higher education. In this case also more
probable, that depressive symptoms can arise as a result of frustration caused
by inability to learn. This hypothesis can be supported by the results of the
same study evaluating by multiple regression analysis the background factors
of depression. According to this analysis an important background factor of
depressive symptoms is, that the persons wanted to learn further but were not
able to do so (9). Among men the low level of education shows among the not
material socioeconomic factors the most significant connection with
depression. Both the personal income and the employment status are more
closely connected to depression than to morbidity rate directly. The
connection between morbidity (absent) rate and depression seems to be even
more important among women than among men. Among women the low level of
education shows the closest connection with depression among the socioeconomic
factors, the second most important factor was the housing condition, that is
the lack of comfort of the lodging. The socioeconomic situation of women
is more closely connected to the overall situation of the family (Such as own
property, accessibility to car) which are related to depression and through
depression to higher morbidity rate among women too. In contrast to men, among
women, their own income or employment situation were in direct connection with
absent rate without being in connection with depression. Among women with low
income and low employment situation the absence rate might be a result of
rational considerations to remain at home for a while with children or to
solve other family problems such as the care of an elderly relative. In these
cases the absent rate might be an index of the cost-benefit analysis of the
family, because the financial consequences of the absenteeism have no serious
implications in the majority of women living in family. These results
indicate that severity of depressive state and symptoms can be regarded
serious risk factors of general morbidity and the majority of risk
consequences of low socioeconomic situation are mediated by depressive
symptomatology, that is by hopelessness, self-blame, pessimism, working
disability, lack of satisfaction. It is an important task of future preventive
interventions to take into consideration depression as a fundamental
psychosocial risk factor.
Table 1. Prevalence of depressive symptoms in
the Hungarian population in 1988
0-9 |
10-18 |
19-25 |
26 or higher |
normal |
mild depressive symptoms |
moderately severe depressive symptoms |
severe depressive symptoms |
n=15,304 |
n=3,389 |
n=929 |
n=593 |
75.7 % |
16.8 % |
4.6 % |
2.9 % |
Table 3. Percentage of absent rates because of different causes in the
last year
Infectious diseases |
13.1 % |
Home and other accidents |
6.7 % |
Diseases of the muscosceletal system |
5.8 % |
Hypertensive diseases |
4.5 % |
Heart diseases |
4.0 % |
Hepatic diseases |
4 % |
Industrial accidents |
3.6 % |
Disease related to pregnancy, birth |
3.4 % |
Renal disorders |
3.2 % |
Other gastrointestinal diseases |
3.1 % |
Other eye and ear diseases |
3.1 % |
Gastric or duodenal ulcer |
2.9 % |
Traffic accidents |
2.7 % |
Nervous and mental diseases |
2.0 % |
Other respiratory diseases |
1.8 % |
Chronic skin diseases |
1.6 % |
Neoplasm |
1.5 % |
Asthma bronchiale |
1.3 % |
Other metabolic diseases |
1.2 % |
Blood and blood-forming organs diseases |
1.2 % |
Diabetes |
1.1 % |
|
|
|
|
Congenital disorders |
0.5 % |
Diseases caused by alcohol abuse |
0.5 % |
Increased consumption of medicine |
0.5 % |
Glaucoma |
0.3 % |
References 1. Syme,S.L., Berkman,L.F.: Social class,
susceptibility and sickness. Am. J. Epidemiology, 1976, 104,1-8. 2.
Marmot,M.G., Kogevinas, M., Elston, M.A.: Social/economic status and disease.
Annual Rev., Public Health, 1987, 8,111- 135. 3. Scherwitz,L., Perkins,L.,
Chesney,M., Hughes,G.: Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and Subsets: Relationship
to Demographic and Psychosocial Characteristics in young adults in the CARDIA
study, Psychosomatic Medicine, 1991, 53,36-49.; 4. Slater,C.H.,
Lorimer,R.J., Larison,D.R.: The independent contribution of socoeconomic
status and health practices to health status. Prev.Med., 1985,
14,372-373. 5. Wiley,J.A., Comacho,T.C.: Life-style and future health:
Evidence from the Alameda county study. Prev. Med., 1986, 9,1-21. 6.
Statistical Yearbook of Hungary, Budapest, 1993. 7. Kopp,M.S., Skrabski,Á.,
Magyar I.: Neurotics at risk and suicidal behaviour in the Hungarian
population, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1987, 76,406-413. 8. Kopp,M.S.,
Skrabski,Á.: Összehasonlító mentálhigiénés vizsgálatokhoz ajánlott módszertan.
(Methodology of comparative mental health studies) Végeken, 1990, 2,2,4-24 (in
Hungarian) 9. Kopp,M.S., Skrabski, Á.: Magyar lelkiállapot (Hungarian state
of mind) Végeken Publ.Budapest (in Hungarian), 1992. 10. Skrabski,Á.,
Kopp,M.S.: Needs, decrease of ability to work and disorders of social
adaptation. Res., Rev. Hungarian Soc. Sci., 1989, 71-88. 11. Skrabski,Á.,
Kopp,M.S.: Health behaviour, psychiatric symptoms and psychosocial background
factors. In Dauwalder (ed.), Swiss Monographs in Psychology, 1994, Vol. 2:
21-27. 12. Murphy,J.M., Olivier,D.C., Monson,P.R., Sobol,A.M.,
Federman,E.B., Leighton,A.H. Depression and anxiety in relation to social
status. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 1991, 48: 223-229. 13. Beck,A.T., Ward,C.H.,
Mendelsohn,M., Mosk,J., Erbaugh,J.: An inventory for measuring depression,
Archives of General Psychiatry, 1961, 4,561-571 14. Beck,A.T., Beck,R.W.:
Shortened version of BDI. Post. Grad.Med., 1972, 52,81-85. 15. Kopp, M.S.:
Clinical psychophysiology, Psychophysomatic booklets,2,1-35.(in Hungarian),
1985. 17. Eaves,G., Rush,A.J.: Cognitive pattern in symptomatic and
remitted unipolar major depression, Abnorm. Psychol., 1984, 93, 1,
31-40. 18. Szedmák,S., Kopp,M.S., Skrabski,Á.: Mathematical Models for
Complex Non-linear Systems, Semmelweis Science Forum, Budapest, 1994. 19.
Appels,A.: The year before myocardial infarction In: Biobehavioural bases of
coronary heart disease (Eds Dembroski, T.M., Smidt,-t..H., Blumchen,G.)
Karger, Basel, 1983. 20. Falger,P., Appels,A.: Psychological risk factors
over the life course of myocardial infarction patients. Advances in
Cardiology, 1982, 29, 132-139. 21. Freedland,K.E., Carney,R.M.: Depression
as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, Proc.Third Internat. Congr. of
Behavioural Medicine,Amsterdam, 1994 22. Williams,R.: Hostility, depression
and CHD: a common biological mechanism? Proc. Third Internat. Congr. of
Behavioural Medicine, Amsterdam, 1994. 23. Sklar,L. and Anisman,H.: Stress
and coping factors in fluence tumour growth. Science, 1979, 205,
513-515. 24. Lázár,I.: Psychoneuroimmunology, Végeken Publ., Budapest, (in
Hungarian), 1991. 25. Hippius: Medikamentöse Therapie der Panik-Reaction.
Proc of 14th Danube Symposium of Psychiatry, Budapest, 1990 26.
Marmot,M.G.: Relative deprivation as a psychosocial concept,Proc. Third
Internat. congress of Behavioural Medicine, Amsterdam, 1994. 27. Johnson,
J.V.: Work experience over the life course: the influence of occupational
socialization, exposure intensity and career directionality on cardiovascular
disease, Proc.Third Internat. congress of Behavioural Sciences,Amsterdam,
1994.
|
 |