Accepted for publication in J of Epidemiology and Community
Health (2002)
Social Capital in a Changing Society: Cross-sectional
Associations with Middle-Aged Female and Male Mortality Rates
Árpád Skrabski,1 Ph.D., Maria Kopp, M.D., Ph.D.,1
Ichiro Kawachi, M.D., Ph.D.2
1Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis
University of Medicine
H-1089 Budapest, Nagyvárad tér 4., Hungary
Tel: +36 1 210-2953, Fax: +36 1 210-2955
E-mail: kopmar@net.sote.hu
2 Center for Society and Health, Harvard School of
Public Health,
Boston, USA.
Running head: Social Capital, Gender & Mortality
Funding sources: This study was supported by the United
Nation Development Program (UNDP) project no HUN/00/002/A/01/99, and the
National Research Fund (OTKA) projects no T-29067 (1999) and T-32974 (2000).
Conflicts of interest: None
Keywords: social capital, trust, reciprocity, middle aged
mortality, gender differences
What Is Already Known About This Topic
- Social capital - defined as the assets and resources available to
individuals through civic participation - appears to be a potential
determinant of population health status.
- Many Central and Eastern European (CEE) societies experienced a decline in
social capital following economic transformation, as indicated by low levels
of civic trust, and rising levels of anomie.
What This Study Adds
- Indicators of social capital - perceived trust, reciprocity, and support
received from civic and religious organisations - are strongly correlated
with mid-aged (45-64 years) male and female mortality across the 20 counties
of Hungary.
- Mortality rates were most closely associated with levels of mistrust; male
mortality rates were more closely associated with lack of help from civic
organisations, while female mortality rates were more closely connected with
perceptions of reciprocity.
- There are gender differences in the relationship of social capital to
mortality rates.
Abstract
Objectives: Social capital has been linked to self-rated health and
mortality rates. We examined the relationships between measures of social
capital and male/female mortality rates across counties in Hungary.
Design: Cross-sectional, ecological study.
Setting: 20 counties of Hungary.
Participants and methods: 12,640 people were interviewed in 1995 (the
"Hungarostudy II" survey), representing the Hungarian population
according to sex, age and county. Social capital was measured by three
indicators: lack of social trust, reciprocity between citizens, and help
received from civil organisations. Covariates included county GDP, personal
income, education, unemployment, smoking and alcohol spirit consumption.
Main outcome measure: Gender-specific mortality rates were calculated for
the middle-aged population (45-64 years) in the 20 counties of Hungary.
Results: All of the social capital variables were significantly
associated with middle age mortality, but levels of mistrust showed the
strongest association. Several gender differences were observed, namely male
mortality rates were more closely associated with lack of help from civic
organisations, while female mortality rates were more closely connected with
perceptions of reciprocity.
Conclusion: There are gender differences in the relationships of specific
social capital indicators to mortality rates. At the same time, perceptions of
social capital within each sex were associated with mortality rates in the
opposite sex.
Introduction
Up to the end of the 1970s, mortality rates in Hungary were actually lower
than in Britain or Austria. Subsequently, mortality rates continued to decline
in Western Europe, whereas in Hungary and in other Central East European (CEE)
countries this tendency reversed, especially among middle-aged men [1-3]. In the
late 1980s, mortality rates among 45-64 year old men in Hungary rose to higher
levels than they were in the 1930s, while the mortality rates in the older age
groups were comparable to the worst in Western-Europe [2,3] . What explains the
vulnerability of middle aged men during this period of rapid economic change?
This deterioration cannot be ascribed to deficiencies in health care, because
during these years there was a significant decrease in infant and old age
mortality and improvements in other dimensions of health care [2] . Furthermore,
between 1960 and 1989 there was a constant increase in the gross domestic
product in Hungary. Thus the worsening health status of the Hungarian male
population cannot be explained by a worsening material situation [2].
A growing polarisation of the socio-economic situation occurred in the CEE
countries, especially in Hungary between 1960 and 1990. The vast majority of the
population lived at nearly the same low level in 1960, with practically no
income inequality, and there were no mortality differences between
socio-economic strata. Since that time, increasing disparities in socio-economic
conditions have been accompanied by a widening socio-economic gradient in
mortality, especially among males. According to Whitehead, Inequalities in
Health [4]:
"The trends in Hungary over the past fifty years show that in the
pre war period there were large differentials in mortality rising from
non-manual to manual occupations and highest in manual agricultural workers.
These differences decreased under the new system after the war, until by
1960 they had virtually disappeared. This lack of inequalities was
relatively short-lived, and an increase was noted again for men up until
1983. This resulted from an increase in both groups of manual workers, with
mortality of non manual men remaining unchanged over the period. For women,
inequalities in mortality were also reduced in the immediate post-war period,
and when they increased again, this increase was smaller than that found in
men."
The mortality ratio comparing the lowest to highest educational stratum is
1.8 for Hungarian males, compared to 1.2 for females [5]. That is, one of the
most interesting features of the so-called "Central-Eastern-European health
paradox" is the gender difference in worsening mortality. It is more
intriguing because men and women share the same socio-economic and political
circumstances.
Besides the polarisation of socio-economic circumstances, an attitude of
disrespect for the law relating to financial matters seems to have become more
prevalent in Hungarian society during the period of economic transformation.
This led many citizens to perceive that they could attain a desired standard of
living only through deviant means, thereby increasing the sense of anomie.
Anomie is one of the basic concepts in modern sociology since Durkheim,
referring to a situation in which social norms lose their hold over individual
behaviour [6].
Several studies in Hungary showed a weakening in community values during the
political changes of 1989 and the 1990s. Spéder, for example, found that people
who agreed with the statement "to achieve a good career, one must break some
rules" increased by 12.8% between 1993 and 1997 [7-9].
On the basis of the above facts our hypothesis was that in a suddenly
changing society the county-level variations in "social capital" might be
related differentially to the premature mortality rates among men and women.
There is growing evidence at the individual and within- country level, that
psychosocial factors, like distrust affect health. [10-11] We examined regional
differences in indicators of social capital in Hungary.
Social capital is defined as the assets and resources available to
individuals through their connections to their communities and to society
[12-14] . It has been measured by indicators such as the level of trust between
citizens, the existence of norms of reciprocity, as well as citizen
participation in (and support received from) civic and voluntary associations.
As social cohesion erodes, and the sense of anomie increases, it is
hypothesized that levels of social capital decline in society [12-14]. The
concept of social capital therefore has potential relevance for examining the
mortality crisis in CEE countries [15]. Although the definition and measurement
of social capital has been recently contested [16], it is thought that
constructs such as trust and reciprocity measured at the societal or community
level have meaning and relevance for health outcomes over and above trust and
perceived help measured at the individual level (12).
Methods
The Hungarostudy II is a national cross sectional survey representing the
Hungarian population over the age of 16 according to sex, age, and the 20
counties of Hungary. In 1995 12,640 persons were interviewed in their homes
[17-19] .
Sampling methods
Sample was accomplished through a stratified, multi-stage sampling procedure.
In the first stage all settlements with a population over 5,000 were included in
the sample, and a random selection was made of those with a population of less
than 5,000. In the second stage single households were selected from the Central
Statistical Institute data base according to distribution of the population by
county and settlement size. The final sample was controlled for gender, age, and
settlement size characteristics of the given county. The final sample
characteristics for each county corresponded very well with the population
descriptors of the Central Statistical Office for the required parameters (age,
gender, settlement size). The refusal rate was 19% for the full sample,
although there were significant differences, depending on the settlements. In
big cities the refusal rate was much higher than in villages. In such a large
study the sampling bias caused by the refusals cannot be avoided. For each
refusal, the interviewers selected another person with similar sampling
characteristics in the given neighbourhood. The replacement sampling procedure
was found not to result in significant selection bias. [17-19]
In the present study we used data from these surveys to analyse the
relationships of components of social capital to male and female mortality rates.
Following Putnam [20] and Kawachi [14], individual components of social capital
were measured by three items concerning levels of social trust, perceptions of
reciprocity and support received from civic and religious organisations. The
level of trust was assessed from responses to the item that asked whether the
interviewed person agreed that "People are generally dishonest and selfish and
they want to take advantage of others." (Answer 0-3, Totally disagree to
totally agree). This item is very similar to the item from the US General Social
Survey, used by Kawachi et al. [14] as an indicator of lack of social trust.
Citizens’ perceptions of reciprocity were assessed from the
responses to the item "If I do nice things for someone, I can anticipate that
they will respect me and treat me just as well as I treat them." (Answer 0-3,
Totally disagree to totally agree).
Perceived support from civic or religious organisations was measured
according to Caldwell et al [21]as follows: "In a difficult situation, whose
help can you count on from?" (0 = none, 1 = little 2 = moderate or average 3 =
a great deal). Following this question the interviewers asked separately how
much support the person could expect from civic organisations and separately
from religious organisations?
Civic organisations were defined as non-profit, voluntary organisations,
societies, self-help groups, and clubs. Political parties, unions and churches
were not included. Religious organisations were defined as different types of
formal and informal groups set up on a religious basis.
The weighted average values for the above variables were computed for the 20
Hungarian counties.
We also separately computed the middle-aged male and female averages for the
three social capital items. Male and female mortality rates in the 45-64 years
age group were obtained for each county from the 1995 Statistical Yearbook of
Hungary [2] .
We included the following confounding socio-economic and behavioural
variables: average per capita GDP values (in 1000 HUF) for
each county, the unemployment rate, [2] personal income, education, smoking (prevalence
of smokers based on the Ways of Coping questionnaire(18)) and drinking habits (average
spirit consumption on one occasion). The weighted average values for the above
variables were computed for the 20 Hungarian counties.
Results
The Relationship between Social Capital Measures and male and female middle
aged mortality rates in 1995
In the 45-64 year old population, 1521 men and 1790 women were interviewed.Table 1 shows the correlation coefficients between social capital
variables and female and male middle-aged mortality rates. Among men the most
significant correlations were found with overall mistrust, as well as with male
reports of perceived help from civic associations. Interestingly male mortality
showed a highly significant correlation with perceptions of reciprocity among
females. Among women, the average values of mistrust and reciprocity reported by
females, as well as male reports of perceived help from civic associations were
most strongly correlated with mortality. Male and female mortality rates were
significantly interrelated in the 20 Hungarian counties (r= .571, p = .009).
Table 2.and 3. show the correlation coefficients for male and female
middle age mortality by social capital and confounding variables (per capita
GDP, unemployment, education, personal income, spirit consumption and smoking) .
The markers of material circumstances correlated significantly with social
capital variables. Moreover, both the markers of socio-economic situation and
health behaviours were independently correlated with both male and female
mortality rates. Social capital variables showed also highly significant
correlations with both male and female middle aged mortality rates, more among
women than among men.
After including the socio-economic and behavioural confounding variables,
middle aged male mortality correlated most closely with GDP, unemployment,
personal income and education. Received help from civic organisations, distrust
and reciprocity were also highly significantly correlated with mortality. Among
the social capital variables received support from civic organisations was most
closely connected with GDP, unemployment and personal income.
Among women there was a stronger correlation between female middle aged
mortality and the social capital variables, compared to other SES measures (GDP,
unemployment, income, education) as well as risk behaviour and mortality (alcohol
and smoking). Among the social capital variables, received support from civic
organisations was also more closely connected with GDP and unemployment than the
other social capital variables.
After controlling for these potential socio-economic and behavioural
confounding variables, regression analyses indicate, that the social capital
variables (trust, reciprocity and help from civic organisations) remain
significantly associated with mortality rates. (Table 4 and 5) Among men
in multi-variable regression model, when we included the confounding variables
beside the social capital variables, the variables explained 77.3% of the
variance, more than the social capital variables alone. For men GDP,
unemployment and education were the most important variables explaining the
middle aged mortality differences among counties, but all three social capital
variables remained significant predictors of male mortality.
Among women , in multi-variable regression model, these parameters explained
74.3% of the mortality differentials among countries. Female distrust was the
most important predictor of middle aged female mortality differences among
counties, more important than GDP. Female reciprocity was more important
predictor of female mortality than the other socio-economic and behavioural
parameters.
The male/female difference in perceived support from civic organisations was
significant in relation to religious organisations, but not significant for
other civic organisations:
- Perceived help from religious organisations(1-3) : Male 10.5% female
:14.8%
- Moderate to lots of help from religious organisations(2-3) : male: 5.1%
female : 8.4%
(Chi-square = 19,9, df=3 p < 0.000).
- Perceived help from civic organisations(1-3): Male 5.7 % female :3.1 %
- Moderate to lots of help from civic organisations(2-3): male: 1.2 % female
: 1.2 %
(Chi-square = 1,4, df=3 NS).
There were highly significant differences in perceived support from civic
organisations among counties. In the counties with significantly better health
characteristics (North-Western counties), the perceived support from civic
organisations was highly significantly higher than in the Eastern counties.
We also analysed the same interrelationships of social capital variables with
the mortality rates above 65 years of age. In these age groups the predictive
power of social capital variables was less significant than in the younger age
groups.
Discussion
Overall social trust, which is the opposite of the following statement
"People are generally dishonest and selfish and they want to take advantage of
others", was more strongly correlated with male than the female middle-aged
mortality rates. By contrast, perceived reciprocity (assessed by the question:
"If I do nice things for someone, I can anticipate that they will respect me
and treat me just as well as I treat them") showed a stronger correlation with
female mortality rates. Close instrumental bonds among women also appear to be
protective for men’s health, as judged by the association of perceived
reciprocity among females to male mortality rates.
Perceived help from civic associations seems to be a more important
protective factor for men. These differences suggest that the associations of
social capital to mortality rates may vary by gender, and that gender- and
generation-specific measures of social capital may be more relevant than overall
gender-blind assessments.
Difficulties in the interpretation of civic engagement constitute one
limitation of this study. On the one hand, grass-roots movements and social
organisations were regarded as a sign of open defiance of the state in Hungary
until the end of the 1980s. This situation discouraged most people from becoming
members of such "illegal" organisations. On the other hand, the ruling elite
established so-called "social organisations" in order to influence members
of society. As a result, the concept of "social organisations" gained a bad
reputation in Hungarian society. Toward the end of the 1980s, however, civic
associations and funds could be established without any fear of retaliation or
administrative difficulties. However, many such organisations were used to
conceal economic activities. Due to all these uncertainties, we chose to measure
perceived support from civil and religious organisations instead of
participation in these organisations. Despite difficulties in the interpretation,
male support perceived from civic associations seems to be a very important
protective factor for men, and interestingly for women as well.
There are several studies on the extremely rapid development of new civic
organisations in Hungary after the political changes in 1990, which greatly
exceeded similar processes in neighbouring countries. Although one component of
this process was motivated by obtaining financial benefits through new forms of
organisation (e.g., significant tax benefits at the beginning, because the state
wanted to revitalise the voluntary civic society), there was also an enormous
collective desire to build up the earlier suppressed networks in society. Before
the Soviet occupation there was a very rich network of such civic and religious
groups and associations in Hungarian society. The participation of men was much
more significant in these voluntary groups, although women also participated
actively in religious groups.
Perceived help from civic organisations showed the strongest correlations
with GDP, unemployment and personal income. The interrelatedness suggests that
the significance of civic associations is most strongly connected with the
prosperity of society. On the basis of a cross sectional study it is not clear
what is the primary direction of this connection. Because of the very strong
interrelatedness between the absolute material situation of the counties and the
strength of help from civic organisations, this social capital variable may be
explained by the effect of material situation of the counties.
A recent study by Lynch et al [10] suggests that mistrust among the social
capital variables do not seem to be a key factor in understanding health
differences between the rich countries included in their sample. They noted that
mistrust and other psychosocial factors may explain health at the individual and
within-country level. Their study excluded Russia, Poland, Hungary, and the
Czech and Slovak Republics, although in these countries the correlation between
income inequality and life expectancy seems to be strong, and the
mistrust-health interactions in these changing societies may be especially
important. [1] [15] in several other studies of societies undergoing rapid
social and economic change, psychosocial factors may indeed be important
determinants of the mortality crisis. [23-27]
Our paper analysed within-country data. The main question of the paper was
related to the intriguing phenomenon of the gender and age-group related
differences in patterns of mortality changes. Men and women, elderly and middle
aged persons, shared the same socioeconomic and political circumstances. What
can explain the higher vulnerability of middle aged men compared to women and
people in older age groups?
Socio-economic differences and risk behaviours are well known risk factors of
increasing mortality, especially in CEE countries. Mortality can be regarded as
a "final common endpoint" for all of the risk factors. Our underlying
hypothesis was that social factors influence health by way of intermediate
behavioural, mental, and physiological processes. Among known behavioural risk
factors, increasing spirit consumption can only partly explain the rising
mortality; therefore there is a need for additional explanatory models. [22,23]
Social capital seems to be an important component of environmental influences,
although it is not the sole determinant of increasing mortality rates. From a
systems theory perspective, we need to understand the inter-connected and
mutually reinforcing connections between economic deprivation, risk behaviours
and low social capital.
The main findings of our paper can be summarised as follows:
- Different indicators of social capital - perceived trust, reciprocity,
and support received from civic and religious organisations - were
strongly correlated with middle -aged (45-64 years) male and female
mortality across the 20 counties of Hungary.
- Mortality rates were most closely associated with levels of mistrust; male
mortality rates were more closely associated with lack of help from civic
organisations, while female mortality rates were more closely connected with
perceptions of reciprocity.
On the basis of our results it can be hypothesised that in the last decades
the social support system of men was more deeply affected by the changes in
Hungarian society, while the close-knit network of women remained relatively
unchanged. In a suddenly changing society new and more adaptive ways of coping
are necessary for adaptation. In a relatively traditional society, middle aged
men appear to be more vulnerable to rapid changes in social contexts.
It is an interesting finding that the most important social capital variables
of the opposite sex seem to be protective for the other sex. Thus, support
perceived by men is a protective factor for women, while the amount of
reciprocity perceived by women seems to be a significant predictor of male
health. Such interrelationships could not be analysed on the individual level.
These interactions show that the ecological study of health determinants is an
important supplement to the individual level approaches, especially in societies
undergoing rapid change. [15] [19]
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the United Nation Development Program (UNDP)
project no HUN/00/002/A/01/99, the National Research Fund (OTKA) projects No
T-29067 (1999) and T-32974 (2000) and NKFP 1/002/2001.
References
1. Wilkinson, RG. Health, civic society in Eastern Europe
before 1989, in Environmental and non-environmental determinants of the
East-West life expectancy gap. Hertzman, C (Ed) Kluwer, Amsterdam 1996.
2. StatisticalYearbook of Hungary, Budapest 1995.
3. Health for all (HFA) Data Base, WHO Regional Office for
Europe, Copenhagen 1999.
4. Townsend, P, Davidson, N, Whitehead, M. In: Whitehead,
Inequalities in Health, The Black Report, and The Health Divide, Penguin 1992;
p.294.
5. Mackenbach, JP, Kunst, A, Groenhof, F et al. Socioeconomic
inequalities in mortality among women and among men: an international study. Am
J Public Health 1999;89:1800-1808.
6. Giddens, A. Sociology. Polity Press, Oxford 1989.
7. Spéder, Zs. The trends of anomie in the near past, old
and new arguments. Presentation at the Conference on "New political system in
the new century in Hungary" Budapest, 1999; 11. 3.
8. Spéder, Zs. Hungary in Flux, Society, politics and
transformation, Kramer, Hamburg 1999.
9. Andorka, R. Social changes and social problems in Hungary
since 1930s: economic, social and political causes of demise of state socialism,
Comparative Social Research 1994;14:49-96.
10. Lynch, J, Davey Smith, G, Hillemeier, M et al. Income
inequality, the psychosocial environment, and health: comparisons of wealthy
nations. Lancet 2001;358:194-200.
11. Everson, SA, Kauhanen, J, Kaplan, GA et al. Hostility and
increased risk of mortality and acute myocardial infarction: the mediating role
of behavioural risk factors. American Journal of Epidemiology
1997;146:142-152.
12. Kawachi, I, Berkman, LF. Social cohesion, social capital,
and health. In: Berkman LF and Kawachi I (eds). Social Epidemiology. New York,
Oxford University 2000.
13. Kawachi, I, Kennedy, BP. Health and social cohesion: why
care about income inequality? British Medical Journal 1997;Volume 314,
April.
14. Kawachi, I, Kennedy, BP, Lochner, K et al. Social Capital,
Income Inequality, and Mortality. American Journal of Public Health 1997;
September, Vol. 87, No., 9.
15. Kennedy, BP, Kawachi, I, Brainerd, E. The role of social
capital in the Russian mortality crisis. World Development
1998;26:2029-2043.
16. Portes, A (1998) Social capital: its origins and
applications in modern sociology. Ann.Rev.Sociol 24:1-24.
17. Kopp, MS, Skrabski, Á, Szedmák, S. Socioeconomic
differences and Psychosocial Aspects of Stress in a Changing Society. Ann. New
York Acad. Sci. 1998a;851:538-543.
18. Kopp, MS, Falger, P, Appels A et al. Depressive symptomatology and vital
exhaustion are differentially related to behavioural risk factors for coronary
artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine 1998b;60:752-758.
19. Kopp, MS, Skrabski, Á, Szedmák, S. Psychological Risk
Factors, Inequality and Self-rated Morbidity in a Changing Society, Soc Sci
Med 2000;51:1350-1361.
20. Putnam, RD. Making Democracy Work, Princeton NJ.,
Princeton University Press 1993.
21. Caldwell, RA, Pearson, JL, Chin, RJ. Stress moderating
effects: social support in the context of gender and locus of control. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin 1987;13, 2:5-17.
22. SPSS Manual. The SPSS Base 7, 5 for Windows Users Guide,
Chicago, IL, SPSS Inc. 1997.
23. Cornia, GA, Panicia, R. (Eds) The Mortality Crisis in
Transitional Economies, Oxford 2000.
24. Bobak, M, Marmot, M. East-West mortality divide: Proposed
research agenda.. British Medical Journal 1996;312:421-425.
25. Bobak, M, Pikhart, H, Rose, R et al. Socioeconomic
factors, material inequalities and perceived control in self-rated health: cross
sectional data from seven post-communist countries. Social Sciences and
Medicine 2000;51:1343-1350.
26. Marmot, M, Wilkinson, R. Social Determinants of Health,
Oxford Univ Press 1999.
27. Kaplan, GA. Where do shared pathways lead? Psychosom.Med.
1995;57:208.
Table 1.
Pearson correlations for female and male (45-64 years old) mortality by
social capital variables (weighted by number of cases, age 45- 64)
|